Tag Archives: exhaust

Vance and Hines Upsweep Slip-On Exhaust | Gear Review

Vance and Hines Upsweep Slip-On Exhaust Honda Rebel 1100 review
We tested the Vance & Hines Upsweep Slip-On Exhaust on the 2021 Honda Rebel 1100.

Motorcycles appeal to the inner child, and I believe nurturing that part of our psyche is best done in the garage, bolting parts onto our bikes, especially when they make cool vroom vroom noises. As much as we enjoyed riding the 2021 Honda Rebel 1100, we knew it could be better. So we called up Vance & Hines and ordered its Upsweep Slip-On exhaust.

Right out of the box, the level of quality on the V&H pipe is evident, from the matte black ceramic finish and classic Eliminator style end-cap to the laser-engraved riveted badging. Although it says “competition only,” that’s just part of V&H branding. The Upsweep Slip-On is street-legal and 50-state compliant.

Vance and Hines Upsweep Slip-On Exhaust Honda Rebel 1100 review
Eliminator-style end-cap

Since this is a cat-back slip-on — that is, only the part of the exhaust that’s aft of the catalytic converter is replaced — installation is straightforward. All you need are a few basic tools: 12mm combination wrench, 10mm and 12mm sockets, a driver, and 4mm and 6mm hex wrenches. Just loosen the clamp, remove the mounting bolt and remove the stock muffler and gasket. Installing the new pipe is basically the same thing in reverse, with the addition of a heat shield.

Whereas the Rebel 1100’s stock muffler dog-legs up to a fat silencer that runs parallel to the ground and obscures much of the rear wheel, as its name implies, the Upsweep Slip-On points upward, with a 4.5-inch rise. The muffler is shorter than stock and has an attractive tapered-cone shape, increasing both style and cornering clearance. And it shaves 5.5 pounds off the bike.

Vance and Hines Upsweep Slip-On Exhaust Honda Rebel 1100 review

In back-to-back testing on Jett Tuning’s dyno, the V&H exhaust yielded an additional 3.2 horsepower and 2.3 lb-ft of torque near redline at 7,500 rpm. Low-rpm is where it matters most on a cruiser, and below 4,000 rpm the V&H exhaust added as much as 2.4 horsepower and 4.3 lb-ft of torque. In the midrange, differences were negligible. Given that this is a straightforward bolt-on exhaust that doesn’t run afoul of the guv’mint, modest gains are acceptable.

Where the V&H slip-on really stands out is the deeper, more resonant sound it produces. The stock exhaust is pretty ho-hum, but the Upsweep Slip-On emits a robust bellow that’s music to my ears and brings the Rebel 1100’s parallel-twin alive. Twist the grip, smile, repeat. The V&H pipe is louder than stock but isn’t obnoxious and meets SAE J2825 sound standards, though wearing earplugs on the freeway is a good idea.

Cool looks, less weight, added performance, and great sound, all for just $499.99.

For more information: See your dealer or visit vanceandhines.com

The post Vance and Hines Upsweep Slip-On Exhaust | Gear Review first appeared on Rider Magazine.
Source: RiderMagazine.com

Minister rejects uniform exhaust levels petition

A Queensland petition calling for motorcycle noise limits to be standardised to “power equipment” levels of 115dB has been rejected by Roads Minister Mark Bailey.

He says a uniform upper noise (stationary) limit of 115 or 110dB(A) for all vehicles would “effectively increase the permissible noise limit of a vast majority of the entire vehicle fleet, and for some vehicles quite dramatically”. 

“A consideration is recognising that every 10 dB increase is a doubling of perceived loudness, so such a proposal would not meet community expectations,” he says. 

The petition was started after the Motorcycle Advocacy Group (Qld) Facebook page claimed police harassment of riders and multiple defect notices.

This is despite data from the Queensland Transport and Main Roads Department showing only 13 motorcycles received defect notices last year and none was for exhaust noise.

The petition was lodged on 4 February 2021 by MAG spokesman David White who said it received 240 signatures in the first hour. 

It pointed out that there is a disparity between state and federal vehicle regulations on exhaust noise. This disparity is similar in most other states.

Click here to read the full text of the petition.

The Minister’s response also referred to the disparity of laws between states as another reason not to modify Queensland laws which would put the state even further out of kilter with other states.

Despite the petition’s rejection, David says the group can now reply to the Minister’s response and “engage TMR (Transport and Main roads) at Parliamentary level”.

police harassment exhaust noise cops
An officer checks exhaust noise levels at Samford (Facebook photo)

Here is the full text of the Minister’s response:

I refer to petition 3464-21 lodged with the Legislative Assembly on 21 April 2021 about the regulation of vehicle noise emissions in Queensland. 

The Palaszczuk Government is committed to maintaining a robust framework to ensure vehicles used on Queensland roads are in a safe condition and meet regulatory requirements, including requirements relating to noise emissions. The government does not agree that the regulatory requirements are unworkable, or in conflict with the Australian Design Rules (ADRs). 

The current standards relating to vehicle noise levels are set by the Australian Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications under the Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989 (Cth) (the Act). The Act requires all road vehicles to comply with the relevant ADRs at the time of manufacture and supply to the Australian market. 

ADR83/00 Vehicle Standards (Australian Design Rule 83/00 – External Noise) 2005 applies to all vehicles manufactured from 2005 onwards. ADR83/00 requires a vehicle to firstly meet a set maximum noise limit, with the limit varying depending on the purpose of use and size of the motor vehicle or motorbike. This is known as a ‘Drive by Maximum Noise Test’, as the vehicle noise test is carried out when the vehicle is in motion and driven past a testing device. 

Once a vehicle passes the drive by test limit, the ADR secondly requires the vehicle to undergo a ‘Stationary Noise Test’ and record the result for the vehicle. The stationary vehicle noise test is carried out with the vehicle stationary next to the testing device. While stationary noise test results can vary, it should be recognised that the vehicle has already passed the prescribed drive by maximum noise limits specified in ADR83/00. 

All in-service or registered vehicle categories (heavy, light and motorcycles) must continue to meet ADR83/00. 

In Queensland, the Transport Operations (Road Use Management—Vehicle Standards and Safety) Regulation 2010 (the VSS Regulation) prescribes the same requirements that are specified in ADR83/00. The VSS Regulation is aligned with the national regulatory requirements and further allows for a 5db tolerance if an in-service vehicle is noise tested (using the Stationary Noise Test method) to allow for equipment degradation. 

KTM 790 Adventure R

The VSS Regulation also includes additional information for vehicles that are either certified to older national requirements, or that are not certified at all (pre-ADR requirements). Importantly, if a vehicle exhaust system is modified or exchanged; the system must remain compliant to the noise standard. Vehicle owners whose vehicles are modified contrary to these requirements are liable for prosecution. 

The maximum noise limit for each vehicle is detailed on public facing website, www.greenvehicleguide.gov.au, which is maintained by the Australian Government, so that members of the public can check the documented maximum noise level applicable for their vehicle. 

The option proposed by petitioners to set a uniform upper noise (stationary) limit of 115 or 110 dB(A) for all vehicles would effectively increase the permissible noise limit of a vast majority of the entire vehicle fleet, and for some vehicles quite dramatically. A consideration is recognising that every 10 dB increase is a doubling of perceived loudness, so such a proposal would not meet community expectations. 

For these reasons, the Palaszczuk Government does not support the introduction of a uniform upper noise limit, particularly as doing so would create a conflict between Australian laws, and of other States and Territories, as well as increasing vehicle noise levels in the community generally. 

The Queensland Police Service and the Department of Transport and Main Roads compliance officers regularly undertake compliance and enforcement activities throughout Queensland and respond to noise and emission issues on a regular basis. 

I would like to thank all petitioners for bringing their concerns to the attention of the House and I trust this information is of assistance. 

For motorcycles manufactured post-2005, the noise data can be found on a label on the motorcycle itself. 

  

Source: MotorbikeWriter.com

Akrapovič Has Two New Exhaust Options For 2021 Aprilia RS 660

One Street, One Track

It ain’t an Aprilia if it isn’t screaming like a MotoGP track bike… Right? Akrapovič – the industries leading exhaust manufacturer – has two full exhaust systems ready for the 2021 Aprilia RS 660 motorcycle.

The Racing Line (S-A6R2) is a carbon fiber exhaust that will rely on your stock ECU mapping (this is a major benefit; you will avoid the expensive tuning cost to have your motorcycle run properly with the new airflow metrics) with a 2.5 horsepower increase at 11,200 rpm and 2.7 lb-ft bump in torque at 4550. This exhaust will also shed a pound off the wet weight of your motorcycle.

S-A6R1 is the “track use” (haha) variant that aims to bring 3 horsepower and 5 lb-ft of torque while also shedding 2.5 pounds from the weight of your ride. This exhaust won’t keep your ride Euro 5 compliant, however.

Bitcoin

The official Akra website currently has no info regarding pricing or purchasing these exhaust systems, but I’m sure you can expect to find them through official dealers in the new year.

Source: MotorbikeWriter.com

Throw out unworkable exhaust laws: Barrister

A Brisbane Barrister has called on the Queensland Government to throw out the current exhaust laws after two cases against riders were dismissed in the Brisbane Magistrates Court on 14 September 2020.

Barrister Levente Jurth, who wrote an article for Motorbike Writer in 2016 saying aftermarket exhausts were not illegal, says the current rules are “unworkable”.

The Magistrates Court of Queensland at Brisbane recently found Levente’s clients, Craig Rowland and Jason Tziros, not guilty and dismissed charges against them relating to their motorcycle exhausts exceeding the relevant stationary noise level under section 5(1)(a)(vi) of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Vehicle Standards and Safety) Regulation 2010.

The Department of Transport and Main Roads who ran the prosecution was also ordered to pay $1500 in legal costs.

Mr Rowland and Mr Tziros were charged in a police operation on Mt Tambourine in May 2018 after having their Harley Davidson motorcycle exhausts tested by Senior Constable Paul Hocken of the Road Policing Command, Road Policing Task Force, Boondall, the State’s most senior and most experienced exhaust noise tester.

The Court found that the mandated test procedure set out in the National Stationary Exhaust Noise Test Procedure for In-Service Motor Vehicles – September 2006 required strict compliance for a valid noise test to support a charge and Senior Constable Hocken had failed to comply with it in a number of respects.

His errors included failing to properly calibrate the sound level meter and failing to properly measure the position of the microphone of the sound level meter.

2015 Sturgis Rally senior citizens

“When the requirements for obtaining a valid noise test are so complex that it involves lengthy legal argument in court and the State’s top cop with some three decade’s experience and one of only two police officers qualified to train other police officers in exhaust noise testing cannot get it right, it’s time to throw the current rules out and start again,” Mr Jurth said.

“This case has demonstrated that the current rules are simply unworkable, both from the point of view of riders attempting to comply with them as well as police officers attempting to enforce them.”

Source: MotorbikeWriter.com

MV Agusta partners with Akrapovic

MV Agusta has announced an industrial partnership with Slovenian exhaust systems manufacturer Akrapovič.

The agreement includes the supply of exhaust systems designed and produced for specific MV Agusta models.

Akrapovič has similar deals with other manufacturers and for several years has been supplying original mufflers for BMW and now Indian.

It’s not unusual for motorcycle companies to develop such partnerships. The most obvious is Ducati and Termignoni, but many other companies have developed partnerships over the years.

Akrapovič claims to be a pioneer in the “innovative use of titanium and super-alloys, and are at the forefront of carbon-fibre components construction”.

The company was founded by racing champion Igor Akrapovič and works closely with several teams in MotoGP, World-Superbikes and MXGP.

Akrapovic sounds

New MV Agusta CEO Timur Sardarov says the sound of the exhaust on one of their bikes is critical.

“Sound is part of the MV Agusta experience. It’s a key element to its style and we pay a lot of attention to it,” he says.

“Our three and four-cylinders models have quite unique personalities and we’ve always worked towards matching them with hair-raising sound, but this partnership goes well beyond the look and sound; it is really about leading-edge technology, performance and uncompromising quality.

“MV Agusta and Akrapovič have a very similar approach to industrial excellence, accepting nothing but the best. I welcome this partnership as a natural alliance between like-minded leaders in their own field, which will bring about many synergies and even better products for the enjoyment of motorcycle enthusiasts around the world.”

Akrapovič CEO Uroš Rosa says the partnership is a “natural fit”.

“Count Domenico Agusta and Igor Akrapovič both came from a racing background and created winning global brands through their passion, making this collaboration a natural fit,” he says.

“Akrapovič will create innovative products for the beautiful MV Agusta models that are coming soon, with designs that have never been seen before.

“With high-tech, race-proven materials, such as titanium and carbon fibre, we will create systems that will enhance the ‘Motorcycle Art’ that MV Agusta prides itself on, and our engineers will produce a unique sound for the range. Our exhausts will make a statement for all to see and hear that perfectly complements MV Agusta motorcycles.”

Source: MotorbikeWriter.com

Bike noise crackdown intensifies

The news just gets worse and worse for riders who enjoy a fruity exhaust note as the noise crackdown intensifies across Europe.

We recently reported on Germany’s crackdown with special noise cameras, no-go areas and an 80dB limit on motorcycle exhausts that could make all BMW motorcycles quieter.

Now Austria will ban specific motorcycles with exhaust noise over 95dB on a popular 100km motorcycle route through the Tyrol mountains after receiving complaints from residents.

Bike noise crackdown intensifiesTyrol mountains are popular among riders (Image: www.touring-italy.net)

Bikes that will be barred from this road include the Aprilia Tuono, Aprilia RSV4, BMW S 1000 RR, Ducati Hypermotard, Ducati Multistrada 1260, Ducati Diavel, Kawasaki Z900 and KTM 890 Duke.

Police will do spot checks on motorcycles and can hand out €220 (about $A350) on-the-spot fines.

Crackdown intensifies

We could appreciate a crackdown on exceedingly loud aftermarket exhausts, but these bikes are all legally allowed to have more than 95dB under European regulations.

Somehow Austria thinks this area is exempt from European laws.

And what is worse is that the ban only applies to motorcycles, not cars or trucks or buses! That’s discrimination, pure and simple.

Like the German example, this is a sobering precedent that could be picked up by safety and noise pollution Nazis across the world.

It follows moves by several other European countries to close roads to motorcycles because of noise and banning them from certain areas over weekends and public holidays.

Quieter roads

Call to challenge exhaust noise fines sign noise camerasPolice conduct roadside noise test at Mt Tamborine

While Australia is yet to introduce Draconian laws like the road bans in Europe, police and transport officers do occasionally operate noise monitoring checks on popular motorcycle routes.

It may seem heavy handed, discriminatory and ignoring the perceived safety benefits of “loud pipes save lives”, but it’s nothing compared with Indian police methods.

In India, police make a subjective assessment followed by smashing the offending exhaust pipe on the roadside.If you think the cops are tough on noisy aftermarket exhausts here, try India where they hammer them flat by the roadside, or confiscated them and flattened them with a backhoe.

They have also made an example of their crackdown by steam rolling confiscated pipes.

Source: MotorbikeWriter.com

S&S Cycle adds modes to Indian FTR 1200

S&S Cycle has developed an Engine Control Manager system to add the engine modes of the FTR 1200 S to the base model.

In 2018, the Wisconsin company was quick to develop a full exhaust system for the just-released Indian FTR 1200 similar to the prototype model that had everyone salivating.

It cost a whopping $US1874.95 (about $A2878), so they followed up with more affordable slip-on mufflers at $US489.95 (about $750) plus various billet aluminium bits and pieces.

They claim the bike is “one of our favourite new machines”.

S&S Cycle prototype exhaust for Indian FTR 1200

S&S ECM

The exhaust, muffler and parts must have been a success because they have now added the S&S Engine Control Manager costing $US199.95 (about $A306).

S&S Cycles ECM for Indian FTR 1200

It includes a handlebar-mounted switch that communicates with the bike’s ECM and unlocks the Rain and Sport modes previously unavailable on the base model.

Rain mode has a smooth throttle control while Sport has maximium response and power delivery.

“Simple installation and easy-to-access switch allows for quick mode changes and transforms the bike in a single click,” the say.

Indian FTR 1200

2020 Indian FTR 1200 Carbon2020 Indian FTR 1200 Carbon

  • FTR 1200 basic black for $20,995;
  • FTR 1200 S in red and grey or titanium and black for $22,995;
  • Race-Replica with Akrapovic exhaust, red frame and FTR750 flat track racer tank graphics from $24,995; and
  • Carbon at $26,995.

The Carbon is based on the FTR 1200 S  model but adds carbonfibre fenders, tank, airbox cover, and headlight and tail cowls, but not wheels.

Early this month, parent company Polaris announced their motorcycle sales were up by 2% (they never reveal actual unit sales) in the first quarter.

This is despite global motorcycle sales decreasing and Harley-Davidson sales down by 17.7%.

Polaris Industries claim it is the result of strong sales of FTR 1200 and the new Challenger liquid-cooled tourer.

Source: MotorbikeWriter.com

Germany and BMW may get quieter

Germany is cracking down on noisy exhausts with special noise cameras, no-go areas and an 80dB limit on motorcycle exhausts that could make all BMW motorcycles quieter.

The government is yet to vote on the proposals. If these measures are approved, it could have ramifications beyond its borders.

Apart from other authorities copying the moves, it could mean all BMW bikes are quieter as it is unlikely the company would build separate specification bikes for various markets.

BMW R NineT Scrambler projectBMW Scrambler with standard Akrapovic exhaust

The measures also include banning all but electric vehicles from certain areas on Sundays and public holidays and giving police impound rights for noisy offenders.

It follows a February move by German state Baden-Wurttenberg which first proposed the crackdown and a complete ban on aftermarket exhausts.

Several other European countries are also closing roads to motorcycles because of noise and banning them from certain areas over weekends and public holidays.

Noise cameras

Noisy cameras noise exhaustNoisy cameras noise exhaustParis noise camera

Germany plans to use similar noise cameras to those trialled by the UK Department of Transport and French noise pollution agency Bruitparif last year.

The cameras detect noise, identify the culprit, take a photo and automatically issue a fine.

While they are set up to detect any noisy vehicles, the Parisienne devices are specifically targeting motorcycles with one set up in Saint-Forget, a hilly rural area near Paris popular with riders.

These “noise cameras” or “noise radars” are still under trial and no fines have been issued fines yet, but it may not be long before they are being used in Australia and other countries.

Last year we contacted police in each state and received mainly non-committal replies saying they monitor the development and introduction of all traffic enforcement technologies around the world.

WA Police were the only ones to admit they were actively monitoring the UK prototype noise cameras and said they would “seek information on its operational effectiveness”.

Queensland Transport and Main Roads say they have trialled other equipment but only to detect noise levels of heavy vehicles.

“Although the technology can potentially be used for detecting noisy, modified or defective exhausts in light vehicles and/or motorcycles there is currently no plan to extend the trials or legislation to include those vehicles in Queensland,” a spokesperson told us.

Quieter roads

Call to challenge exhaust noise fines sign noise camerasPolice conduct roadside noise test at Mt Tamborine

While Australia is yet to introduce Draconian laws like the road bans in Europe, police and transport officers do occasionally operate noise monitoring checks on popular motorcycle routes.

It may seem heavy handed, discriminatory and ignoring the perceived safety benefits of “loud pipes save lives”, but it’s nothing compared with Indian police methods.

In India, police make a subjective assessment followed by smashing the offending exhaust pipe on the roadside.If you think the cops are tough on noisy aftermarket exhausts here, try India where they hammer them flat by the roadside, or confiscated them and flattened them with a backhoe.

They have also made an example of their crackdown by steam rolling confiscated pipes.

Source: MotorbikeWriter.com

Mr Termignoni dies aged 75

The founder of the motorcycle exhaust company that brought music to the ears of many riders, Luigi Termignoni, has died, aged 75.

Luigi founded the Termignoni exhaust company in 1969 in Predosa, Italy.

Luigi Termignoni
Luigi Termignoni

His exhausts were made famous in the Paris-Dakar rallies of the ’70s and ‘80s and even the Le Mans 24 Hours Race for their performance, light weight and strength.

Termignoni exhausts have won 10 MotoGP championships, 16 World Superbikes and many other titles including cross country, enduro, trials, motocross and road racing.Luigi Termignoni

His exhausts became the aftermarket pipe to fit to a Ducati after Conti exhausts bit the dust.

The company also supported Beta, Honda, Kawasaki, Montessa, MV Agusta, Ossa e and Yamaha.

Luigi sold the factory a decade ago and was president until 2015.

Our sincere condolences to Luigi’s family, friends and devotees.

Rather than a minute’s silence for his passing, perhaps we should braaap our throttles in remembrance!

You can read the full history of the company here.

Source: MotorbikeWriter.com

Is it legal to remove your motorbike’s cat?

Police are allegedly fining riders who remove the catalytic convertor or cat from their motorcycle, according to several motorcycle dealers.

While the replacement of the muffler or exhaust system may contravene noise rules, removing the cat has nothing to do with noise, but with air pollution.

The cat is that ugly metal box often underneath your motorcycle.

It burns red hot to reduce toxic gases and the size of pollutants in the exhaust gas.

Some actually claim it causes more asthmatic reactions because it reduces the size of the airborne carbon which infiltrates the lungs easier.

Cat removal

cat catalytic convertor
Ugly muffler and cat on a Ducati Scrambler

Brisbane barrister Levente Jurth is currently investigating the laws as he is challenging a fine for an aftermarket exhaust on his Aprilia Tuono 1100.

Despite exhaustive legal research, he says he can find no mention in the ADRs of removing a catalytic convertor being illegal.

However, there remains conflicting views over whether it is illegal to remove the cat.

Mark Barnett, Product Manager for Link International which distributes Arrow exhausts says the gaseous emissions laws under ADR 79.04 do not apply to scooters, motorcycles or trikes.

“Some of our dealers have said they know of riders being prosecuted for removing cats,” Mark says.

He says the Federal Department of Transport and Regional Services told him that ADR 79.04 would never be applied to motorcycles as it was “too difficult to enforce and the numbers are too small to make it worth their while”.cat catalytic convertor

However, Motorcycle Council of NSW exhaust expert Brian Wood says bikes are also subject to environment laws.

Once registered, a vehicle becomes subject to the ‘in-service’ regulations that apply in the state in which the vehicle is registered,” he says.

In NSW, most ‘in-service’ regulations are administered by the Roads and Maritime Services (RMS).

“In the case of exhaust emissions, it’s the NSW Environment Protection Authority.”

He says that under the NSW Clean Air Act, it is an offence to remove, disconnect or impair a system.

The offence for an individual is 200 penalty units. A penalty unit is current $110. So 200 penalty units would be $22,000.

Similar rules apply around the country.

So while you may be able to remove the cat under ADRs, you may run foul of environment laws.

Aftermarket exhaustsAftermarket exhaust peeves enemy resale illegal cat

While on the subject of aftermarket exhausts, Mark says the ADRs override local state rules.

“We’ve had TMR officers in Queensland going to dealerships and saying every bike on the plot fitted with an aftermarket exhaust is illegal and the fine is $550,” he says.

“This is not true. A European homologated exhaust is legal under ADR and therefore is legal in all states and territories in Australia.

“I had an email from a TMR policy office agreeing that an aftermarket exhaust is legal providing it complies to ADR 83.00 and that for a LAMS bike it does not improve the engine performance.

“That’s a ‘gotcha’ for LAMS as most aftermarket exhausts will give an improvement, albeit in Arrow’s case only slight with the dB killer in place.

“However, for some bikes this may break the 150kW-per-tonne LAMS power limit.”

Brian also points out that the ADRs only apply up until the bike is registered and rolls out of the showroom.

Conclusion?

Sorry we can’t be more definitive on the legalities of removing a cat.

It seems to be a grey area that is exploited by police and transport officials to penalise motorists.

Stay tuned for Levente’s challenge to the laws. He is hopeful of a win that will set a legal precedent for all riders.

We will have the verdict on his case as soon as it is available.

Source: MotorbikeWriter.com